Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 6;2019:5376165. doi: 10.1155/2019/5376165

Table 2.

Comparison between the different studied groups according to MMP-1 and TIMP-1.

CG1 CG2 CG3 CG4 LFG MSCs + CCl4G MSCsG p
MMP-1 Mean ± SD 1.01 ± 0.01 1.05 ± 0.08 1.02 ± 0.04 1.02 ± 0.02 0.41 ± 0.09abcd 0.71 ± 0.10abcde 1.06 ± 0.08ef <0.001
TIMP-1 0.97 ± 0.05 0.98 ± 0.11 0.99 ± 0.10 0.93 ± 0.09 3.90 ± 0.60abcd 2.24 ± 0.57abcde 0.91 ± 0.09ef

p values for ANOVA test: significance between groups was done using post hoc test (Tukey). aSignificant compared with CG1. bSignificant compared with CG2. cSignificant compared with CG3. dSignificant compared with CG4. eSignificant compared with LFG. fSignificant compared with MSCs + CCl4G, statistically significant at  p ≤ 0.05.