Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 19;14:9031–9046. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S223447

Table 3.

Comparison FTIR Spectra Of TM Extracts And Their Respective AgNPs

aTML aTMSB
Peak Position In Extracts (cm−1) Peak Position In AgNPs At 25 °C (cm−1) Shift In Position (cm−1) Type Of Chemical Bond Peak Position In Extracts (cm−1) Peak Position In AgNPs at 70°C (cm−1) Shift In Position (cm−1) Type Of Chemical Bond
1338.32 1384.39 +46.07 C–H methyl rock alkanes 1048.80 ---------- ---------- C-O Stretch
1640.29 1638.56 −1.73 –C=C–stretch alkenes 1131.16 ---------- ----------
1876.99 1884.90 +7.91 C=O Anhydrides 1384.03 1384.96 +0.93 C-H methyl rock alkanes
2946.61 2830.64 −115.97 H–C=O:C–H stretch aldehydes 1639.21 1638.68 −0.53 –C=C– stretch alkenes
3530.47 3417.07 −112.48 OH Alcohol, phenols 2016.03 2034.58 +18.55 –C≡C– stretch alkynes
3545.10 3417.99 −127.11 2930.41 2789.28 −141.13 H–C=O:C–H stretch aldehydes
3647.29 3712.96 +65.67 3530.72 3530.35 +0.37 OH Alcohol, phenols
3544.94 3544.99 +0.05
3717.06 3731.61 +14.55

Note: Shift values were calculated by subtracting the peak position in TM-AgNPs from the peak position in TM-extracts.

Abbreviations: FTIR, Fourier-transform infrared; AgNPs, silver nanoparticles; TM, Terminalia mantaly; aTML, aqueous TM leaf extracts; aTMSB, aqueous TM stem bark.