Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 8;34(45):e300. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e300

Table 1. Characteristics of scientific hypotheses and narrative and systematic reviews.

Characteristics Hypothesis Narrative review Systematic review
Authors and contributors Any researcher with interest in the topic Usually seasoned authors with vast experience in the subject Any researcher with interest in the topic; information facilitators as contributors
Registration Not required Not required Registration of the protocol with the PROSPERO registry (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/) is required to avoid redundancies
Reporting standards Not available Not available Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standard (http://www.prisma-statement.org/)
Search strategy Searches through credible databases to retrieve items supporting and opposing the innovative ideas Searches through multidisciplinary and specialist databases to comprehensively cover the subject Strict search strategy through evidence-based databases to retrieve certain type of articles (e.g., reports on trials and cohort studies) with inclusion and exclusion criteria and flowcharts of searches and selection of the required articles
Structure Sections to cover general and specific knowledge on the topic, research design to test the hypothesis, and its ethical implications Sections are chosen by the authors, depending on the topic Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion (IMRAD)
Search tools for analyses Not available Not available Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (Study Design) (PICO, PICOS)
References Limited number Extensive list Limited number
Target journals Handful of hypothesis journals Numerous Numerous
Publication ethics issues Unethical statements and ideas in substandard journals ‘Copy-and-paste’ writing in some reviews Redundancy of some nonregistered systematic reviews
Citation impact Low (with some exceptions) High Moderate