Table 3. Comparison of dietary quality indices across the DASH tertiles .
Variables | DASH diet | P value fortrend a | P value for comparison T1&T2 b | P value for comparison T1&T3 b | P value for comparisonT2&T3 b | ||
T1 (n = 108) | T2 (n= 101) | T3 (n =95) | |||||
AHEI-2010 | 24.61 ± 8.01 | 23.04 ± 7.87 | 21.23 ± 8.26 | 0.010 | 0.541 | 0.002 | 0.615 |
DDS | 5.10 ± 1.15 | 5.52 ± 1.25 | 5.47 ± 1.01 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.453 |
Diversity score of dairy | 1.12 ± 0.61 | 1.36 ± 0.60 | 1.19 ± 0.61 | 0.010 | 0.006 | 0.075 | 0.003 |
Diversity score of fruits | 1.54 ± 0.53 | 1.65 ± 0.52 | 1.73 ± 0.48 | 0.010 | 0.123 | 0.005 | 0.914 |
Diversity score of vegetables | 0.69 ± 0.28 | 0.78 ± 0.31 | 0.82 ± 0.28 | 0.002 | 0.033 | 0.001 | 0.342 |
Diversity score of grain | 1.06 ± 0.24 | 1.14 ± 0.26 | 1.10 ± 0.27 | 0.122 | 0.312 | 0.374 | 0.221 |
Diversity score of meat | 0.67 ± 0.40 | 0.57 ± 0.42 | 0.61 ± 0.46 | 0.281 | 0.212 | 0.341 | 0.415 |
DDS/DED | 4.4 ± 1.9 | 5.7 ± 2.5 | 6.7 ± 2.9 | <0.001 | 0.050 | <0.001 | 0.070 |
DED | 1.26 ± 0.30 | 1.15 ± 0.27 | 0.99 ± 0.35 | <0.001 | 0.020 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
MAR | 1.18 ± 0.41 | 1.19 ± 0.46 | 1.17 ± 0.48 | 0.933 | 0.922 | 0.931 | 0.900 |
DASH, dietary approach to stop hypertension; AHEI, Alternative Healthy Eating Index; DDS, dietary diversity score; DED, dietary energy density; MAR, mean adequacy ratio.
a One-way ANOVA for DED and ANCOVA test for other variables (adjusted for energy intake) and <0.05 is significant
b Tukey test; c Mean± SD.