Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 24;9(4):291–298. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2019.40

Table 3. Comparison of dietary quality indices across the DASH tertiles .

Variables DASH diet P value fortrend a P value for comparison T1&T2 b P value for comparison T1&T3 b P value for comparisonT2&T3 b
T1 (n = 108) T2 (n= 101) T3 (n =95)
AHEI-2010 24.61 ± 8.01 23.04 ± 7.87 21.23 ± 8.26 0.010 0.541 0.002 0.615
DDS 5.10 ± 1.15 5.52 ± 1.25 5.47 ± 1.01 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.453
Diversity score of dairy 1.12 ± 0.61 1.36 ± 0.60 1.19 ± 0.61 0.010 0.006 0.075 0.003
Diversity score of fruits 1.54 ± 0.53 1.65 ± 0.52 1.73 ± 0.48 0.010 0.123 0.005 0.914
Diversity score of vegetables 0.69 ± 0.28 0.78 ± 0.31 0.82 ± 0.28 0.002 0.033 0.001 0.342
Diversity score of grain 1.06 ± 0.24 1.14 ± 0.26 1.10 ± 0.27 0.122 0.312 0.374 0.221
Diversity score of meat 0.67 ± 0.40 0.57 ± 0.42 0.61 ± 0.46 0.281 0.212 0.341 0.415
DDS/DED 4.4 ± 1.9 5.7 ± 2.5 6.7 ± 2.9 <0.001 0.050 <0.001 0.070
DED 1.26 ± 0.30 1.15 ± 0.27 0.99 ± 0.35 <0.001 0.020 <0.001 <0.001
MAR 1.18 ± 0.41 1.19 ± 0.46 1.17 ± 0.48 0.933 0.922 0.931 0.900

DASH, dietary approach to stop hypertension; AHEI, Alternative Healthy Eating Index; DDS, dietary diversity score; DED, dietary energy density; MAR, mean adequacy ratio.

a One-way ANOVA for DED and ANCOVA test for other variables (adjusted for energy intake) and <0.05 is significant

b Tukey test; c Mean± SD.