Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 25;9(22):12459–12470. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5688

Table 2.

Best generalized linear mixed model on the effect of bank vole density, vole weight, season, and forest type as well as their interaction (×) on PUUV infection probability of bank voles

Estimate Estimate Standard error z‐value p‐value
Fixed effects
Intercept −3.08 0.64 −4.82 <.001
Vole weight 0.13 0.02 6.90 <.001
Bank vole density 0.18 0.09 2.05 <.05
Autumn −0.69 0.51 −1.34
Clear‐cut 0.54 0.67 0.81
Unburnt reference forest −0.87 0.38 −2.37 <.05
Bank vole density × autumn −0.21 0.09 −2.37 <.05
Autumn × Clear‐cut −0.00 0.73 −0.01
Autumn × Unburnt reference forest 1.42 0.45 3.16 <.01
Variance Standard deviation
Random effects
Trapping plot 0.00 0.00
Year 0.00 0.00