Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 17;9(6):1233–1243. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz071

Table A2.

Actual intervention received analysis (N = 121)

Repeated measures model effects Total AUDIT Drinks per drinking day Drinking days in 14 days Heavy episodic drinking
Intervention Received main effect F = 1.09 (p = .2980) F = 0.01 (p = .9542) F = 0.01 (p = .9168) F = 4.15 (p = .0439)
Time main effect F = 10.66 (p = .0001) F = 8.89 (p = .0003) F = 8.03 (p = .0005) F = 15.37 (p < .0001)
Intervention Received x Time interaction F = 0.06 (p = .9441) F = 0.85 (p = .4286) F = 1.20 (p = .3040) F = 0.55 (p = .5810)
Model-based Least Squares Means Baseline 2 Weeks FU 8 Weeks FU Average Row
Total AUDIT
 Intervention 20.51 18.15 17.05 18.57
 Control 18.67 15.98 15.26 16.64
 Average column 19.59 17.06 16.16
Drinks per drinking day
 Intervention 3.42 2.52 2.62 2.85
 Control 3.55 2.65 2.22 2.81
 Average column 3.48 2.58 2.42
Drinking days in 14 days
 Intervention 6.37 5.06 4.84 5.42
 Control 5.83 4.77 5.39 5.33
 Average column 6.10 4.91 5.12
Heavy episodic drinking
 Intervention 2.55 2.34 2.03 2.32
 Control 2.25 1.88 1.57 1.90
 Average column 2.40 2.14 1.80
Pairwise contrasts for time effect Total AUDIT Drinks per Drinking Day Drinking Days in 14 days Heavy Episodic Drinking
Baseline vs. 2 Weeks FU t = 3.49 (p = .0007) t = 3.79 (p = .0002) t = 3.94 (p = .0001) t = 2.70 (p = .0079)
Baseline vs. 8 Weeks FU t = 4.59 (p < .0001) t = 3.90 (p = .0002) t = 2.70 (p = .0080) t = 5.53 (p < .0001)
2 Weeks FU vs. 8 Weeks FU t = 1.53 (p = .1276) t = 0.80 (p = .4279) t = -0.62 (p = .5361) t = 3.39 (p = .0010)

Degrees of freedom for F-tests are df = 1,119 for the intervention-received main effect, and df = 2,119 for both the time main and intervention-received x time interaction effects. Degrees of freedom for all pairwise contrast t-tests are df = 119. N = 85 for the intervention-received group and N = 36 for the control-received group.