Table 5.

Estimated Correlation of Depression With Anxiety, Acculturative Stress, Farmworker Stress, and Social Support by Instrument Used to Measure Depression

	Full CES-D	Boston × 4a	Boston × 2b	Colec
Anxiety
Overall sampled	710***	.669***	.600***	.672***
Study 2	.545***	.525***	.501***	.414**
Study 3	774***	.744***	.682***	.743***
Study 4	.663***	.636***	.547***	.575***
Study 5	.692***	.632***	.608***	.660***
Study 6	.665***	.613***	.559***	.669***
Study 7e	.761***	.709***	.598***	.732***
Acculturative stress
Overall sample	.455***	.426***	431***	.440***
Study 1	.402***	.396***	.428***	.425***
Study 2	.548***	.525***	.561***	.517***
Study 6	.477***	.428***	.405***	.439***
Farmworker stress
Overall sample	.358***	.378***	.342***	.329***
Study 3	.468***	451***	423***	.444***
Study 4	.279*	.386**	.404**	.141
Study 5	.494***	.565***	.468***	.445***
Study 7	.288***	.292***	.245**	.277***
Social support
Overall sample	−.356***	−.308***	−.300***	−.341***
Study 1	−.315***	−.263**	−.255**	−.298***
Study 2	−.544***	−.436**	— 460***	−.544***
Study 6	−.321***	−.306***	−.267***	−.289***

Note: Study 1 = Downtown Los Angeles, collected in 1996; Study 2 = Michigan and Ohio, collected in 1998; Study 3 = Olathe/Montrose, Colorado (phase I), collected in 2001–2002; Study 4 = Olathe/Montrose, Colorado (phase II), collected in 2002; Study 5 = Grand Junction, Colorado, collected in 2001; Study 6 = Eastern North Carolina, collected in 2002; Study 7 = Eastern North Carolina, collected in 2003. CES-D = Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale.

^a.10 items identified by Kohout, Berkman, Evans, and Cornoni-Huntley (1993) using four response categories.

^b.10 items identified by Kohout and colleagues (1993) using dichotomous response categories.

^c.10 items identified by Cole, Rabin, Smith, and Kaufman (2004).

^d.r of Boston × 2 is statistically different from r of full CES-D: z = 3.50.

^e.r of Boston × 2 is statistically different from r of full CES-D: z = 2.40.

^*p < .05.

^**p < .01.

^***p < .001 (one-tailed)