Table 3.
Summary of important characteristics of the Co-design partners.
| Initiative identifier | City | Core shared activities | Scale of activity | Level of ICT adoptiona | Existing public sustainability impact reporting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initiative 1 | London | Growing, cooking and eating | Multiple-sites in one city | Medium | Qualitative evidence of impact presented through stories in blog on website and twitter |
| Initiative 2 | London | Cooking and eating | Multiple-sites in one city | Medium | Qualitative evidence of impact presented through stories in blog on website and twitter |
| Initiative 3 | Dublin | Growing | Single site in one city | Low | Little impact reporting of any kind visible |
| Initiative 4 | Dublin | Food redistribution | Multiple sites in multiple countries | High | Quantitative impact assessment reported online on website in real time. Also produce an annual report which contains quantitative and qualitative impact evidence. |
a
ICT adoption categories: High = driving innovation in the sector, Medium = active engagement with ICT developments, Low = not essential to day to day operations.