Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 25;14(11):e0225240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225240

Table 2. Correlations of the CQS with Cross-Cultural Competence Inventory and other measures (e.g. personality, empathy).

Non-Professionals:
Group of non-cross-cultural trainers
Professionals:
Group of cross-cultural trainers
Session 1: Test Session 2: Retest Correlations with CQS
(total score)
Correlations CQS
M SD Cronbach's α M SD Cronbach's α r M SD Cronbach's α r
Cross-Cultural Competence Inventory1 218.26 22.04 .82 N/A
r(303) = .66,
*p < .001
236.84 21.20 .85 r(31) = .76,
*p < .001
Emphatic Sensitiveness Scale Empathic Concern 40.36 5.32 .73 r(349) = .12,
*p = .028
N/A
Personal Distress 24.57 4.44 .65 r(349) = -.14,
*p = .008
Perspective Taking 33.23 4.18 .69 r(349) = .32,
*p < .001
The Need for Closure Scale Order 12.56 2.95 .77 r(349) = .02,
p = .703
Predictability 163.29 1.89 .73 r(349) = -.02,
p = .674
Ambiguity 13.17 2.45 .66 r(349) = -.06,
p = .236
Closed Mindedness 7.74 2.19 .68 r(349) = -.41,
*p < .001
Decisiveness 10.12 3.23 .78 r(349) = .11,
*p = .037
International Personality Item Pool–Big Five Markers 20 Extraversion 15.34 3.71 .83 r(349) = .20,
*p < .001
Agreeableness 18.23 2.35 .67 r(349) = .19,
*p < .001
Conscientiousness 15.46 3.34 .74 r(349) = .02,
p = .669
Emotional Stability 13.04 3.08 .72 r(349) = .09,
p = .104
Intellect 16.99 2.52 .66 r(349) = .37,
*p < .001
The Social Desirability Scale 15.57 4.71 .66 r(349) = .16,
*p < .001
Emotional Intelligence Scale Perception of emotions and empathy N/A 34.56 4.62 .77 r(349) = .30,
*p < .001
Insight with emotional knowledge 36.11 4.15 .70 r(349) = .15,
*p = .005
Mood managing 27.61 3.89 .74 r(349) = .22,
*p < .001
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale 25.31 6.60 .86 r(349) = .10,
p = .058
IPIP-50 Extraversion 3.32 0.74 .90 r(349) = .18,
*p < .001
Agreeableness 3.92 0.53 .82 r(349) = .25,
*p < .001
Conscientiousness 3.52 0.58 .81 r(349) = .14,
*p = .008
Emotional Stability 2.82 0.70 .88 r(349) = .07,
p = .165
Intellect 3.58 0.51 .76 r(349) = .36,
*p < .001

Notes:

1We analysed results for the CCCI after excluding participants performing highly on the Lie and Social Desirability scale. Significant results are marked with an asterisk (e.g. *p).