Table 4.
Goodness‐of‐fit indices for the hypothetical models tested and measurement invariance across gender
| Model | χ 2 | df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA (90% CI) | WRMR | ΔCFI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One‐factor | 564.25 | 189 | .961 | .957 | .035 (.032–.039) | 1.391 | |
| Measurement invariance | |||||||
| Male (n = 739) | 307.42 | 189 | .971 | .968 | .029 (.023–.035) | 1.042 | |
| Female (n = 849) | 395.22 | 189 | .961 | .956 | .036 (.031–.041) | 1.164 | |
| Configural invariance | 699.02 | 378 | .966 | .962 | .033 (.029–.036) | 1.562 | |
| Strong invariance | 714.72 | 397 | .966 | .964 | .032 (.028–.035) | 1.620 | −.01 |
Note. χ 2: chi square; df: degrees of freedom; CFI: comparative fit index; TLI: Tucker‐Lewis index; RMSEA: root mean square error of approximation; CI: confidence interval; WRMR: weighted root mean square residual; ΔCFI: change in comparative fix index.