Table 2.

(A) Goodness‐of‐fit indexes for the proposed models in the putatively healthy controls (sample: n = 311)

Model	χ2	df	CFI	RMSEA [95% CI]	SRMR	BIC	ssBIC	McDonald's omega
One‐factor	214.22, p < 0.0001	104	0.815	0.078 [0.063–0.092]	0.068	13,812.68	13,660.44	0.836
Two‐factor	173.10, p < 0.0001	103	0.882	0.062 [0.046–0.078]	0.067	13,745.23	13,589.82	0.845
Four‐factor	114.55, p = 0.116	98	0.972	0.031 [0.000–0.052]	0.051	13,665.06	13,493.79	0.856

(B) Goodness‐of‐fit indexes for the proposed models in the participants with a diagnosis of a mental disorder (sample: n = 111)
Model	χ2	df	CFI	RMSEA [95% CI]	SRMR	BIC	ssBIC	McDonald's omega
One‐factor	212.57, p < 0.0001	104	0.837	0.109 [0.088–0.130]	0.078	6,304.30	6,152.61	0.914
Two‐factor	197.87, p < 0.0001	103	0.857	0.103 [0.081–0.124]	0.080	6,290.76	6,135.91	0.917
Four‐factor	143.10, p = 0.002	98	0.935	0.071 [0.044–0.096]	0.062	6,237.59	6,066.94	0.928

Note. BIC: Bayesian information criterion; CFI: comparative fit index; RMSEA: root mean square error of approximation; SRMR: standardized root mean square residual; ssBIC: sample size adjusted BIC.