Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 28;27(1):e1601. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1601

Table 1.

Harms and benefits of triage/assessment or treatment for true and false positives

Ill Benefit of triage/assessment Harm of triage/assessment Benefit of treatment Harm of treatment
Yes (true positive) •Identify needs and plan treatment •None (costs are warranted and part of providing care) • Reduce symptoms • N/A (risk of adverse effects should be considered and balanced in choosing appropriate treatment)
• Prevent incidents, violence, premature mortality
No (false positive) • Potential to propose strategies to address other needs outside of scope of work by mental health staff • Inconvenience • Prevent later illness among sub‐threshold cases • Adverse effects of treatment
• Potential stigma
• Abuse of prescriptions in prisoner population
• Divert resources to assessment that could be used to treat known illness
• Divert treatment resources towards lower need cases who may benefit less
• Provide support for distressing symptoms
• Document baseline mental health status
• Mission creep (e.g., treating non‐illness for security reasons)
• Stigma, including potential prolonged incarceration