Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 21;26(3):e1535. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1535

Table 2.

Comparison of the characteristics of individuals selected for the Phase 2 diagnostic assessment for the Tianjin Mental Health Survey who did and did not complete the assessment

Characteristic Phase 2 assessment status
completed (n = 4,438) % not completed (n = 125) % univariate analysis OR (95%CI)a multivariate analysisb OR (95%CI)a
Sex
male 42.5% 44.8% 1.00 1.00
female 57.5% 55.2% 1.10 (0.77–1.57) 0.96(0.66–1.41)
Residence
rural 24.8% 27.0% 1.00 1.00
urban 75.2% 73.0% 0.89 (0.59–1.34) 0.76(0.45–1.28)
Age range
18–29 9.8% 15.2% 1.00 1.00
30–39 14.3% 15.2% 1.47(0.77–2.80) 1.87(0.92–3.8)
40–49 19.8% 17.6% 1.74(0.94–3.26) 2.23(1.09–4.55)
50–64 33.1% 36.0% 1.43(0.83–2.47) 1.48(0.73–3.02)
65+ 23.1% 16.0% 2.24(1.18–4.24) 2.11(0.86–5.19)
Years of education
0–6 28.4% 28.8% 1.00 1.00
7–9 33.0% 33.6% 1.00(0.64–1.57) 1.34(0.80–2.24)
10–12 22.2% 20.0% 1.13(0.67–1.89) 1.66(0.91–3.02)
13+ 16.3% 17.6% 0.94(0.54–1.61) 1.55(0.78–3.09)
Per capita family income
below median 45.2% 40.8% 1.00 1.00
above median 53.0% 57.6% 1.20(0.84–1.73) 1.38(0.91–2.11)
unknown 1.8% 1.6% 1.22(0.30–5.08) 1.24(0.3–5.18)
Marital status
never married 6.5% 7.2% 1.00 1.00
married/co‐habiting 77.8% 80.0% 1.07(0.54–2.14) 0.59(0.26–1.39)
divorced/widowed 15.7% 12.8% 1.35(0.59–3.09) 0.92(0.33–2.53)
Number of adults in household (age ≥ 18)
1 13.9% 15.2% 1.00 1.00
2 54.3% 52.8% 1.12(0.67–1.88) 1.7(0.86–3.34)
3 20.3% 23.2% 0.95(0.53–1.71) 1.4(0.69–2.83)
4 or above 11.4% 8.8% 1.42(0.67–3.01) 2.15(0.9–5.18)
Employment status
housewife 9.2% 4.8% 1.00 1.00
farmer 11.9% 9.6% 0.65 (0.24–1.74) 0.59(0.21–1.66)
other employed 35.3% 48.0% 0.39 (0.17–0.90) 0.32(0.13–0.78)
unemployed 11.6% 12.8% 0.48 (0.18–1.22) 0.46(0.18–1.21)
retired 32.0% 24.8% 0.68 (0.28–1.63) 0.60 (0.23–1.53)
a

Confidence intervals in bold type as statistically significant at the p < 0.05 level.

b

The multivariate logistic regression includes all the variables in the table.