Table 1.
Challenge assay | Mouse source | Challenge cell line | N | Number of tumor-bearing mice | Tumor development (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cured by DaRT + CP + CpG + sildenafil | CT26 | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
Naïve | CT26 | 10 | 10 | 100 | |
Cured by DaRT + CP + CpG + sildenafil | DA3 | 8 | 8 | 100 | |
Naïve | DA3 | 10 | 10 | 100 |
Winn assay | Splenocytes source | Cell line | N | Number of tumor-bearing mice | Tumor development (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treated by DaRT + CP + CpG + sildenafil | CT26 | 12 | 2 | 17 | |
Naïve | CT26 | 12 | 12 | 100 | |
Treated by DaRT + CP + CpG + sildenafil | DA3 | 9 | 9 | 100 | |
Naïve | DA3 | 8 | 8 | 100 |
Mice that were cured by DaRT, sildenafil, low-dose CP and CpG (n = 18) and naïve mice (n = 20) were inoculated with 5 × 105 CT26 or DA3 cells (Challenge assay). Percent of animals that developed tumors following challenge is presented. Naïve mice were injected intradermally with splenocytes from either naïve or CT26-bearing mice treated by DaRT and immunomodulators, coupled with CT26 or DA3 tumor cells in the relation of 45 Ly:1 TC (Winn assay). Percent of tumor development is presented. The presented results are based on cumulative data from two different experiments