Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 19;10:2530. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02530

TABLE 3.

Correlations among variables for the full group of participants (n = 175).

Speech in noise perception (SiN) Speech perception (sentences) Speech perception (monosyllables) Language ability Non-verbal IQ Memory span
Speech in noise perception (SiN) 1 −0.47∗∗ p < 0.001 −0.60∗∗ p < 0.001 −0.60∗∗ p < 0.001 −0.27∗∗ p < 0.001 −0.33∗∗ p < 0.001
Speech perception (sentences) −0.47∗∗ p < 0.001 1 0.40∗∗ p < 0.001 0.45∗∗ p < 0.001 0.16 p = 0.037 0.23∗∗ p = 0.002
Speech perception (monosyllables) −0.60∗∗ p < 0.001 0.40∗∗ p < 0.001 1 0.34∗∗ p < 0.001 0.19 p = 0.011 0.17 p = 0.027
Language ability −0.60∗∗ p < 0.001 0.45∗∗ p < 0.001 0.34∗∗ p < 0.001 1 0.44∗∗ p < 0.001 0.58∗∗ p < 0.001
Non-verbal IQ −0.270∗∗ p < 0.001 0.16 p = 0.037 0.19 p = 0.011 0.44∗∗ p < 0.001 1 0.29∗∗ p < 0.001
Memory span −0.33∗∗ p < 0.001 0.23∗∗ p = 0.002 0.17 p = 0.027 0.58∗∗ p < 0.001 0.29∗∗ p < 0.001 1

p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01. Speech-in-noise perception measured by age-adjusted HINT SRT in noise [dB SNR)]; speech perception (sentences) measured by sentences in quiet (% words correct); speech perception (monosyllables) measured by % correct words; language ability measured by The Core Language Index of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF-4) (standard score); non-verbal IQ measured by Raven’s matrices (standard score); memory span measured by CELF Digit span subtest (scaled score of forward and backward digit span combined).