Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 19;6:408. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00408

Table 5.

Behavioral activities (% of total observations) at week 2 after weaning (42 days of age).

Behavior at week 2 after weaning DD MO Significance
CON SUB CON SUB DV FP DV × FP
“Ingestive behavior”
Eating feed 11.1 ± 0.6 11.3 ± 0.5 10.5 ± 0.6 11.7 ± 0.5 0.88 0.23 0.41
Drinking 2.0 ± 0.3 1.5 ± 0.3 1.9 ± 0.3 1.9 ± 0.3 0.49 0.40 0.071
“Exploratory behavior”
Exploring feed(er) and drinker 3.1 ± 0.3 3.3 ± 0.5 3.4 ± 0.5 3.8 ± 0.4 0.43 0.39 0.68
Exploring environment 18.8 ± 1.2a 29.4 ± 2.6b 28.3 ± 3.2b 26.5 ± 1.6b 0.09 0.04 <0.01
Nosing environment 9.5 ± 1.2 12.0 ± 1.1 11.7 ± 1.1 11.3 ± 0.7 0.47 0.22 0.18
Rooting environment 1.1 ± 0.2 2.0 ± 0.5 1.7 ± 0.5 2.2 ± 0.4 0.04 0.03 0.18
Chewing environment 6.6 ± 1.3a 13.1 ± 2.1b 12.8 ± 2.0b 10.5 ± 1.4ab 0.15 0.14 <0.01
Chewing air 1.7 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.4 2.0 ± 0.5 2.5 ± 0.5 0.64 0.23 0.75
“Postures and locomotion”
Inactive behavior 50.5 ± 2.2a 40.5 ± 2.5b 43.6 ± 2.5b 41.1 ± 2.0b 0.17 <0.01 0.08
Standing and walking 2.8 ± 0.2 3.8 ± 0.2 3.1 ± 0.3 3.6 ± 0.2 0.73 <0.01 0.27
“Pig-directed behavior”
Nosing pen mates 4.1 ± 0.3a 3.3 ± 0.2ab 2.9 ± 0.3b 3.6 ± 0.3ab <0.10 0.98 0.03
Ear biting 0.4 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1 0.32 0.88 0.19
Tail biting 0.6 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.3 0.5 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1 0.32 0.48 0.81
Belly nosing 0.2 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.2 0.4 ± 0.4 0.93 0.73 0.89
Manipulating pen mates 1.1 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.2 0.90 0.64 0.091
Mounting pen mates 0.5 ± 0.2 0.3 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.2 0.3 ± 0.1 0.99 0.28 0.94
Aggression 0.1 ± 0.05 0.2 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1 0.70 0.63 0.48
“Other behavior”
Playing 3.2 ± 0.4 2.5 ± 0.4 2.3 ± 0.4 3.3 ± 0.3 0.80 0.61 0.031
Comfort behavior 0.3 ± 0.1 0.5 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1 0.5 ± 0.1 0.11 0.54 0.29
Eliminating 1.0 ± 0.1 1.2 ± 0.2 0.8 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.2 0.05 0.37 0.76

Piglets were provided with one solid feed item as monotonous diet (MO) or four solid feed items as diverse diet (DD) before weaning and their pre-weaning diet was presented without substrate (CON) or with substrate (SUB) in one of two feeders. DV, dietary variety; FP, feed presentation. Data are means ± SEM based on pen averages. Within a row superscripts without a common letter differ at P < 0.05. Significant P-values and trends are presented in bold.

1

No significant differences were observed using post-hoc pairwise comparisons of least squares means.