Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019 Aug 20;223(1):256–266. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.07.012

Table 4.

Unadjusted associations between age and select serum PFAS1 (N=213).

PFAS Percent Change in PFAS for each 1-year increase in age
Coefficient (95% CI) R2 (adj.) p-value
PFHxS 2.63 (1.71, 3.67) 0.12 < 0.001
Total PFOS 2.63 (1.92, 3.46) 0.19 < 0.001
Total PFOA1 1.82 (1.11, 2.53) 0.10 < 0.001
PFNA 1.11 (0.50, 1.61) 0.06 < 0.001
PFHpS2 3.15 (2.33, 3.87) 0.11 < 0.001

Abbreviations: PFAS, poly- and perfluoroalkyl substance; N, number of observations; CI, confidence interval; R2(adj.), adjusted coefficient of determination; PFHxS, perfluorohexane sulfonate; Total PFOS, sum of linear perfluorooctane sulfonate and sum of perfluoromethylheptane sulfonate isomers; PFOA, sum of linear and branched perfluorooctanoate; PFNA, perfluorononanoate; PFHpS, perfluoroheptane sulfonate.

1

PFAS were natural log-transformed for the analysis, however, results presented above have been back transformed and represent the percent change.

2

There were no branched perfluorooctanoates (PFOA) detected in any samples, therefore the “Total PFOA” value is equal to the concentration of linear PFOA.

3

Computed using Tobit regression to account for ~18% left-censored data.