Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 24;20(1):1–9. doi: 10.1002/mpr.326

Table 3.

Treatment effect of –1 BDI units

RCT (n = 2000) PRPT (n = 2000)
Preference arm (n = 1600) Randomized arm (n = 400)
Unadjusted Adjusted Unadjusted Adjusted Unadjusted Adjusted
Treatment = –1, confounder = 0
Percentage significant 82.92 82.92 39.77 37.52 25.35 25.35
Treatment effect −1.002 −1.002 −0.9930 −0.992 −0.995 −0.995
Standard error 0.345 0.345 0.583 0.604 0.770 0.770
Treatment = –1, confounder = 1
Percentage significant 82.40 82.55 66.97 37.27 25.57 25.65
Treatment effect −0.994 −0.994 −1.395 −0.993 −1.007 −1.007
Standard error 0.345 0.345 0.584 0.604 0.771 0.769
Treatment = –1, confounder = 2
Percentage significant 82.08 82.67 86.55 38.95 25.48 25.80
Treatment effect −0.9933 −0.9933 −1.809 −1.010 −0.9933 −0.9933
Standard error 0.347 0.345 0.587 0.604 0.776 0.769