Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 12;22(1):1–15. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1377

Table 2.

Results of subgroup analyses according to disorder of included patients and comparator treatment

Effect estimate Heterogeneity
n d (95% CI) p Q (df) p I 2 (%)
Disorder subgroups
Borderline personality disorder 5 0.81 (0.34 to 1.27) <0.001 15.70 (4) 0.003 75
Eating disorders 2 0.34 (−0.07 to 0.75) 0.10 0.72 (1) 0.40 0
Depressive disorders 2 0.40 (0.21 to 0.58) <0.001 0.67 (1) 0.41 0
Cluster C personality disorders 1 0.01 (−0.54 to 0.56) 0.97 n.a. n.a. n.a.
Comparator subgroups
Cognitive (behavioural) therapy 3 0.39 (0.05 to 0.73) 0.03 2.67 (2) 0.26 25
Dialectical behavioural therapy 1 0.17 (−0.26 to 0.60) 0.44 n.a. n.a. n.a.
Structured clinical management 1 0.65 (0.30 to 1.00) <0.001 n.a. n.a. n.a.
Treatment as usual 3 1.15 (0.57 to 1.73) <0.001 4.56 (2) 0.10 56
Mixed treatments 2 0.33 (0.13 to 0.53) 0.001 0.25 (1) 0.62 0

Note: n, number of studies; d, standardized mean difference (Hedges' d); CI, confidence interval; calculations were made with Review Manager 5 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen); n.a., not available.