Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 11;23(1):109–119. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1416

Table 1.

Participant characteristics: telephone interview sample compared with clinical interview sub‐sample

Telephone interview Clinical interview P‐Valueb
N = 2616 N = 500
Variablea n % n %
Sex
Men 2228 85.2 440 88.0 0.10
Women 388 14.8 60 12.0
Age, years
17–24c 878 33.6 160 32.0 0.14
25–34 848 32.5 182 36.4
35–44 634 24.3 103 20.6
≥45 250 9.6 55 11.0
Race
White 2295 87.8 444 88.8 0.73
Black 195 7.5 35 7.0
Other 123 4.7 20 4.0
Income
≤ $60,000 1498 59.1 279 55.8
> $60,001 1038 40.9 205 38.0
Education
High school graduate/GED or less 727 27.8 137 27.4 0.94
Some college or technical training 1234 47.2 240 48.0
College/graduate degree 655 25.0 123 24.6
Marital status
Married 1227 47.0 238 47.6 0.71
Divorced/separated/widowed 252 9.6 53 10.6
Never married 1134 43.4 209 41.8
Rank
Officer 342 13.1 56 11.2 0.25
Enlisted/cadet/civilian employee 2273 86.9 444 88.8
Most recent deployment location
Never deployed 939 36.1 173 34.6 0.66
Non‐conflict area 872 33.5 178 35.6
Conflict area 793 30.5 146 29.2
Number of lifetime deployments
0–1 1756 67.4 323 64.6 0.49
2–3 682 26.2 143 28.6
≥ 4 169 6.5 30 6.0
Total number of traumatic events experienced
0 141 5.4 23 4.6 0.65
1–5 887 33.9 159 31.8
6–11 831 31.8 166 33.2
≥12 757 28.9 152 30.4
a

Some percentages do not equal 100% because of missing values.

b

Chi‐square tests.

c

Emancipated minors as defined by Ohio state law were eligible.