Table 4.
Goodness‐of‐fit statistics of tests for invariance of the SDQ five‐factor and three‐factor structurea
| S–B χ 2 | df | CFI | SRMR | RMSEA | RMSEA 90% CI | Model comparison | Δ S–B χ 2 | Δ df | Δ *CFI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Five‐factor model | ||||||||||
| Model 1 Configural (no constraints) | 2709.60 | 800 | 0.928 | 0.096 | 0.071 | 0.068–0.074 | __ | __ | __ | __ |
| Model 2 Measurement Model invariant (factor loadings) | 3623.43 | 860 | 0.882 | 0.114 | 0.082 | 0.079–0.085 | 2 versus 1 | 1181.53 | 60 | 0.046 |
| Model 3 Structural Model invariant (factor loadings + factor covariances) | 4941.97 | 900 | 0.827 | 0.191 | 0.097 | 0.094–0.10 | 3 versus 1 | 1501.17 | 100 | 0.101 |
| Three‐factor model | ||||||||||
| Model 1 Configural (no constraints) | 3056.34 | 835 | 0.905 | 0.102 | 0.075 | 0.072–0.078 | __ | __ | __ | __ |
| Model 2 Measurement Model invariant (factor loadings) | 4086.94 | 899 | 0.863 | 0.124 | 0.086 | 0.084–0.089 | 2 versus 1 | 695.66 | 64 | 0.043 |
| Model 3 Structural Model invariant (factor loadings + factor covariances) | 4820.61 | 911 | 0.832 | 0.185 | 0.095 | 0.092–0.097 | 3 versus 1 | 701.999 | 76 | 0.073 |
a
CFI and RMSEA are based on a Robust estimating method. S–B χ 2, Satorra–Bentler scales chi‐square.