Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research logoLink to International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
. 2009 Jun 8;18(2):138–146. doi: 10.1002/mpr.285

A psychometric evaluation of the clinician‐rated Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS‐C16) in patients with bipolar disorder

Ira H Bernstein 1,3, A John Rush 2,3,✉, Trisha Suppes 2, Madhukar H Trivedi 2, Ada Woo 1, Yasushi Kyutoku 1, M Lynn Crismon 4, Ellen Dennehy 5, Thomas J Carmody 2
PMCID: PMC6878505  PMID: 19507161

Abstract

The clinician‐rated, 16‐item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS‐C16) has been extensively evaluated in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). This report assesses the psychometric properties of the QIDS‐C16 in outpatients with bipolar disorder (BD, N = 405) and MDD (N = 547) and in bipolar patients in the depressed phase only (BD‐D) (N = 99) enrolled in the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) using classical test theory (CTT) and the Samejima graded item response theory (IRT) model.

Values of coefficient alpha were very similar in BD, MDD, and BD‐D groups at baseline (α = 0.80–0.81) and at exit (α = 0.82–0.85). The QIDS‐C16 was unidimensional for all three groups. MDD and BD‐D patients (n = 99) had comparable symptom levels. The BD‐D patients (n = 99) had the most, and bipolar patients in the manic phase had the least depressive symptoms at baseline. IRT analyses indicated that the QIDS‐C16 was most sensitive to the measurement of depression for both MDD patients and for BD‐D patients in the average range.

The QIDS‐C16 is suitable for use with patients with BD and can be used as an outcome measure in trials enrolling both BD and MDD patients. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords: depression, bipolar disorder, symptom measures, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (231.3 KB).

REFERENCES

  1. American Psychiatric Association (APA) . (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., Text Revision), American Psychiatric Press. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bech P., Rafaelsen O.J. (1980) The use of rating scales exemplified by a comparison of the Hamilton and the Bech–Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 62, 128–132. [Google Scholar]
  3. Berk M., Malhi G.S., Mitchell P.B., Cahill C.M., Carman A.C., Hadzi‐Pavlovic D., Hawkins M.T., Tohen M. (2004) Scale matters: The need for a Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS). Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Supplement, 422, 39–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chioqueta A.P., Stiles T.C. (2003) Suicide risk in outpatients with specific mood and anxiety disorders. Crisis, 24, 105–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gilbert D.A., Altshuler K.Z., Rago W.V., Shon S.P., Crismon M.L., Toprac M.G., Rush A.J. (1998) Texas Medication Algorithm Project: Definitions, rationale, and methods to develop medication algorithms. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59, 345–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hamilton M. (1960) A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamilton M. (1967) Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 278–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Horn J.L. (1965) An empirical comparison of various methods for estimating common factor scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25, 313–322. [Google Scholar]
  9. Humphreys L.G., Ilgen D. (1969) Note on a criterion for the number of common factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 571–578. [Google Scholar]
  10. Humphreys L.G., Montanelli R.G. Jr. (1975) An investigation of the parallel analysis criterion for determining the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10, 193–206. [Google Scholar]
  11. Montanelli R.G. Jr, Humphreys L.G. (1976) Latent roots of random data correlation matrices with squared multiple correlations on the diagonal: A Monte Carlo study. Psychometrika, 41, 341–348. [Google Scholar]
  12. Montgomery S.A., Äsberg M. (1979) A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 382–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Osterberg L., Blaschke T. (2005) Adherence to medication. New England Journal of Medicine, 353, 487–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rush A.J., Carmody T.J., Reimitz P.E. (2000) The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): Clinician (IDS‐C) and self‐report (IDS‐SR) ratings of depressive symptoms. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 9, 45–59, DOI: 10.1002/mpr.79. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rush A.J., Gullion C.M., Basco M.R., Jarrett R.B., Trivedi M.H. (1996) The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): Psychometric properties. Psychological Medicine, 26, 477–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rush A.J., Giles D.E., Schlesser M.A., Fulton C.L., Weissenburger J., Burns C. (1986) The Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): Preliminary findings. Psychiatry Research, 18, 65–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rush A.J., Carmody T.J., Ibrahim H.M., Trivedi M.H., Biggs M.M., Shores‐Wilson K., Crismon M.L., Toprac M.G., Kashner T.M. (2006a) Comparison of self‐report and clinician ratings on two inventories of depressive symptomatology. Psychiatric Services, 57, 829–837. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.6.829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rush A.J., Bernstein I.H., Trivedi M.H., Carmody T.J., Wisniewski S., Mundt J.C., Shores‐Wilson K., Biggs M.M., Woo A., Nierenberg A.A., Fava M. (2006b) An evaluation of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: A sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression trial report. Biological Psychiatry, 59, 493–501, DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.08.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rush A.J., Trivedi M.H., Ibrahim H.M., Carmody T.J., Arnow B., Klein D.N., Markowitz J.C., Ninan P.T., Kornstein S., Manber R., Thase M.E., Kocsis J.H., Keller M.B. (2003a) The 16‐item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician‐rating (QIDS‐C), and self‐report (QIDS‐SR): A psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 573–583, Erratum p. 585, DOI: 10.1016/S0006‐3223(02)01866‐8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rush A.J., Crismon M.L., Kashner T.M., Toprac M.G., Carmody T.J., Trivedi M.H., Suppes T., Miller A.L., Biggs M.M., Shores‐Wilson K., Witte B.P., Shon S.P., Rago W.V., Altshuler K.Z. (2003b) Texas Medication Algorithm Project, phase 3 (TMAP‐3): Rationale and study design. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 64, 357–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rush A.J., Kraemer H.C., Sackeim H.A., Fava M., Trivedi M.H., Frank E., Ninan P.T., Thase M.E., Gelenberg A.J., Kupfer D.J., Regier D.A., Rosenbaum J.F., Ray O., Schatzberg A.F. (2006c) Report by the ACNP Task Force on response and remission in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology, 31, 1841–1853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rush A.J., Trivedi M.H., Carmody T.J., Ibrahim H.M., Markowitz J.C., Keitner G.I., Kornstein S.G., Arnow B., Klein D.N., Manber R., Dunner D.L., Gelenberg A.J., Kocsis J.H., Nemeroff C.B., Fawcett J., Thase M.E., Russell J.M., Jody D.N., Borian F.E., Keller M.B. (2005) Self‐reported depressive symptom measures: Sensitivity to detecting change in a randomized, controlled trial of chronically depressed, nonpsychotic outpatients. Neuropsychopharmacology, 30, 405–416, DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Samejima F. (1997) Graded response model In: Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory (eds van Linden W, Hambleton R.K.), pp. 85–100, Springer‐Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  24. Suppes T., Rush A.J., Dennehy E.B., Crismon M.L., Kashner T.M., Toprac M.G., Carmody T.J., Brown E.S., Biggs M.M., Shores‐Wilson K., Witte B.P., Trivedi M.H., Miller A.L., Altshuler K.Z., Shon S.P. (2003) Texas Medication Algorithm Project, phase 3 (TMAP‐3): Clinical results for patients with a history of mania. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 64, 370–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Trivedi M.H., Rush A.J., Ibrahim H.M., Carmody T.J., Biggs M.M., Suppes T., Crismon M.L., Shores‐Wilson K., Toprac M.G., Dennehy E.B., Witte B., Kashner T.M. (2004a) The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, clinician rating (IDS‐C) and self‐report (IDS‐SR), and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, clinician rating (QIDS‐C) and self‐report (QIDS‐SR) in public sector patients with mood disorders: A psychometric evaluation. Psychological Medicine, 34, 73–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Trivedi M.H., Rush A.J., Crismon M.L., Kashner T.M., Toprac M.G., Carmody T.J., Key T., Biggs M.M., Shores‐Wilson K., Witte B., Suppes T., Miller A.L., Altshuler K.Z., Shon S.P. (2004b) Clinical results for patients with major depressive disorder in the Texas Medication Algorithm Project. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 669–680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES