Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 19;22(3):195–203. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1389

Table 2.

Confirmatory factor analyses comparing model fit of the different factor models in the holdout sample (n 2 = 538)

Models χ 2 SB χ 2 df AIC BIC RMSEA NNFI
M0 53284 45868 231 45912 45928 0.607 0.140
M1 5441 1359 209 1447 1479 0.101 0.976
M2 4382 1075 202 1177 1214 0.090 0.981
M3 4154 987 206 1081 1115 0.084 0.984
M4 3293 715 203 815 852 0.069 0.989
M5 2792 563 187 696 744 0.061 0.991

Note: M0 = null‐model, M1 = one general factor, M2 = original four factors by Fairburn, M3 = EFA model based on the parallel analysis criterion, M4 = EFA model based on Kaiser's criterion, M5 = same as M4, but included a general (g) factor. χ 2 = Chi‐square, SB χ 2 = Satorra–Bentler chi‐square, df = degrees of freedom, AIC/BIC = Akaike's/Bayesian Information Criteria, RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation, NNFI = non‐normed fit index.