Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 13;24(1):11–31. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1458

Table 1.

Overview of recent German general population surveys

Source Year of data collection Case finding instrument Funding Survey mode /sampling frame Age range in years Sample size Threshold for the assessment of gambling problems Past year prevalence estimate of pathological gambling
Buth and Stöver (2008) 2006 DSM‐IV Gambling provider Phone/RDD and online access panel 18 – 65 7,981 Weekly gambling or spending ≥ 50 €/month on some form of gambling 0.56%
Bühringer et al. (2007) 2006 DSM‐IV Public Paper‐pencil and phone and/official inhabitants registries 18 – 64 7,817 Spending ≥ 50 €/month on some form of gambling 0.20%
Haß et al. (2012) 2007 SOGS Gambling provider Phone/RDD 16 – 65 10,001 Any gambling past year 0.19%
Haß et al. (2012) 2009 SOGS Gambling provider Phone/RDD 16 – 65 10,000 Any gambling past year 0.45%
Sassen et al. (2011b) 2009 DSM‐IV Public Paper‐pencil, online and phone /official inhabitants registries 18 – 64 8,006 Spending ≥ 50 €/month on some form of gambling 0.31%
TNS EMNID (2011) 2011 DSM‐IV Gambling machine industry Phone/RDD >18 15,002 Spending ≥ 50 €/month for gambling 0.23%
Haß et al. (2012) 2011 SOGS Gambling provider Phone/RDD 16 – 65 10,002 Any gambling past year 0.49%

SOGS = South Oaks Gambling Screen (Lesieur and Blume, 1987); DSM‐IV = DSM‐IV criteria operationalized according to Stinchfield (2002);

RDD = random digit dialing procedure based on landline telephone numbers.