Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 22;19:308. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2293-2

Table 6.

Correlation matrix analysis

Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1 PSYCH CONSEQ GAMBLING r – .58*** .28*** .16** .67*** .27*** .20*** −.35*** −.01 −.02 .21***
N 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366
2 SOCIAL CONSEQ GAMBLING r .58*** – .39*** −.01 .72*** .22*** .13* −.21*** .02 −.04 .14**
N 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366
3 FINANC CONSEQ GAMBL r .28*** .39*** – .028 .66*** .17** .091 −.20*** .05 .02 .06
N 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366
4 FAMILY RELATION QUALITY r ,.6** −.01 .03 – .06 .49*** −.01 −.02 −.02 −.17** −.01
N 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366
5 PROBLEM GAMBLING r .67*** .72*** .66*** .06 – .26*** .19*** −.35*** .04 .000 .08
N 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366
6 RISK BEHAVIOUR r .27*** .22*** .17** .49*** .26*** – .16** −.12* .08 −.12* .16**
N 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366
7 AGE r .20*** .13* .09 −.01 .19*** .16** – −.14** .06 −.05 .15**
N 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366
8 GENDER r −.35*** −.21*** −.20*** −.02 −.35*** −.12* −.14** – .06 .05 −.16**
N 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366
9 FATHER EMPLOYMENT r −.01 .02 .05 −.02 .04 .08 .06 .06 – .13* .11*
N 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366
10 MOTHER EMPLOYMENT r −.02 −.04 .02 −.17** .01 −.12* −.05 .05 .13* – .01
N 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366
11 SCHOOL SUCCESS r .20*** .14** .06 −.01 .08 .16** .15** −.16** .11* .01 –
N 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366 366

Note: p<.05*; p<.01**; p<.001***

Only significant coefficients equal to or higher than 0.5 were highlighted in bold. Also, significant coefficients with only negative significant prefixes for a certain variable (gender) were presented in bold, as it shows a trend in correlation