. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Child Fam Stud. 2019 Mar 27;28(6):1490–1501. doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01387-8

Table 3.

Predictive Validity Correlations: T1 PDA Physical Proportion Scores with T2 and T3 Measures and T2 PDA Physical Proportion Scores with T3 Measures

	Mothers		Fathers
	T1 Phys Prop	T2 Phys Prop	T1 Phys Prop	T2 Phys Prop
	r	r	r	r
Time 2
Child Abuse Potential Inventory Abuse Scale	.20^**		.00
AAPI-2 Total	.24^**		.23^**
Response Analog to Child Compliance Task Noncomply	.36^**		.38^***
Expected PAQ Authoritarian	.28^**		.29^***
AAPI-2 Value Corporal Punish	.46^**		.49^***
PIotkin Child Vignettes Punishment	.14		.22^*
Time 3
Child Abuse Potential Inventory Abuse Scale	.20^**	.09	.08	.16
AAPI-2 Total	.29^**	.33^***	.19^*	.26^**
Response Analog to Child ComplianceTask Noncomply	.29^**	.32^***	.23^*	.39^***
Expected PAQ Authoritarian	.22^**	.29^***	.34^***	.29^**
AAPI-2 Value Corporal Punish	.35^**	.45^***	.42^***	.58^***
PIotkin Child Vignettes Punishment	.24^**	.28^***	.07	.14
CTSPC Physical Assault	.27^**	.29^***	.19^*	.45^***

Note. T1 = Time 1; T2 = Time 2; T3 = Time 3; AAPI-2 = Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory-2; PAQ = Parental Authority Questionnaire; CTSPC = Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scale.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.

^***

p < .001.