Table 2. Results of the Bland-Altman analysis.
| Actions | Gender | n | Systematic bias | Random bias | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed bias [LOA (Nm)] | Proportional bias [%difference] | |||||||||
| Mesurement methods | Mean | Upper | Lower | Mean | Upper | Lower | MDC (Nm) | |||
| Knee extension | ||||||||||
| Conv-IKD–Belt-HHD | M, F | 26 | 33.9 | −15.0 | 82.7 | |||||
| Conv-IKD–Mod-IKD | M, F | 26 | 55.8 | −10.8 | 122.4 | 32.1 | −0.4 | 122.4 | ||
| Belt-HHD–Mod-IKD | M, F | 26 | 22.0 | −36.7 | 80.6 | |||||
| Conv-IKD–Belt-HHD | M | 16 | 41.5 | −2.3 | 85.4 | |||||
| Conv-IKD–Mod-IKD | M | 16 | 77.4 | 20.5 | 134.4 | |||||
| Belt-HHD–Mod-IKD | M | 16 | 35.9 | −19.4 | 91.2 | |||||
| Conv-IKD–Belt-HHD | F | 10 | 59.6 | |||||||
| Conv-IKD–Mod-IKD | F | 10 | 21.3 | 4.1 | 38.4 | |||||
| Belt-HHD–Mod-IKD | F | 10 | −2.6 | −13.7 | 8.4 | |||||
| Knee flexion | ||||||||||
| Conv-IKD–Belt-HHD | M, F | 26 | 13.4 | −10.7 | 37.5 | |||||
| Conv-IKD–Mod-IKD | M, F | 26 | −3.5 | −26.4 | 19.6 | |||||
| Belt-HHD–Mod-IKD | M, F | 26 | −13.5 | −36.2 | 9.2 | |||||
| Conv-IKD–Belt-HHD | M | 16 | 18.3 | −4.1 | 40.6 | |||||
| Conv-IKD–Mod-IKD | M | 16 | 18.6 | |||||||
| Belt-HHD–Mod-IKD | M | 16 | −14.1 | −36.8 | 8.6 | |||||
| Conv-IKD–Belt-HHD | F | 10 | 22.3 | |||||||
| Conv-IKD–Mod-IKD | F | 10 | −7.0 | −13.8 | −0.2 | |||||
| Belt-HHD–Mod-IKD | F | 10 | −12.6 | −19.8 | −5.4 | |||||
F: female; M: male; Belt-HHD: Measurement using a HHD and a belt; Conv-IKD: Measurement using the isokinetic dynamometer sitting on an attached chair (Conventional IKD); Mod-IKD: Measurement using isokinetic dynamomete sitting on a mat table (Modified IKD); LOA: limits of agreement; MDC: minimal detective change.