Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2019 Sep 4;83(3):1066–1080. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27972

Table 1.

The calculated Yv at IJV of each participant with SCA based on different T2 calibrations. The numbers in the brackets show the normalized differences between the grouped calibrations and the individual calibrations.

individual
calibration
Bush-Wood’s
group calibration
for sickle blood*
Bush-Wood’s
group calibration
for normal blood*
Lu’s
group calibration for
normal blood

1 0.43 0.51 (21%) 0.33 (−22%) 0.19 (−56%)
2 0.66 0.60 (−8.9%) 0.52 (−21%) 0.54 (−19%)
3 0.54 0.64 (20%) 0.53 (−0.7%) 0.50 (−6.2%)
4 0.66 0.70 (6.5%) 0.59 (−10%) 0.53 (−19 %)
Participants 5 0.59 0.55 (−6.3%) 0.43 (−28%) 0.38 (−36%)
with SCA 6 0.59 0.61 (3.9%) 0.50 (−15%) 0.46 (−22%)
7 0.63 0.63 (−0.5%) 0.53 (−17%) 0.51 (−20%)
8 0.70 0.65 (−7.5%) 0.55 (−22 %) 0.52 (−25%)
9 0.66 0.68 (2.3%) 0.55 (−16%) 0.48 (−28%)
10 0.63 0.64 (1.0%) 0.48 (−23%) 0.35 (−44 %)
11 0.65 0.66 (1.6%) 0.53 (−18%) 0.45 (−30%)
Average+/−STD 0.61+/−0.08 0.63+/−0.05 0.50+/−0.07 0.45+/−0.10
*

Our measured T2,corr values were converted based on Eq. 2 to T2,app that is suitable for Bush-Wood’s and Lu’s cablibrations for normal blood.