Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 26;4(6):e00639-19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00639-19

TABLE 3.

Taxa showing a significant different prevalence between African-Americans and European-Americans

Taxon Among all participants (n = 1,616)
Genetic African ancestry percentage (n = 882)
% prevalence
Coefficienta P valueb Coefficienta P valuea
European-
Americans
African-
Americans
Phylum Bacteroidetes
    Species Porphyromonas gingivalis 57.53 76.09 0.75 5.23 × 10−6 1.20 4.05 × 10−7
    Species Porphyromonas sp. oral taxon 285 56.45 71.17 0.53 8.02 × 10−3 0.80 4.22 × 10−4
    Species Prevotella intermedia 61.11 76.09 0.79 4.47 × 10−6 0.82 4.95 × 10−4
        Species Prevotella sp. oral taxon 526 27.78 50.28 0.70 3.32 × 10−5 0.99 9.20 × 10−6
    
Phylum Firmicutes
    Genus Peptococcus 39.61 55.01 0.66 6.30 × 10−5 1.15 2.52 × 10−7
    Family Peptoniphilaceae 85.84 92.16 0.77 0.02 0.86 0.01
    Species Filifactor alocis 42.47 64.18 0.67 4.49 × 10−5 0.87 8.28 × 10−5
    Genus Eubacterium 31.00 49.72 0.60 7.08 × 10−4 0.59 6.49 × 10−3
        Species Eubacterium saphenum 29.57 47.35 0.51 0.01 0.44 0.05
        Species Eubacterium minutum 32.08 53.88 0.75 2.36 × 10−6 0.75 6.91 × 10−4
    Genus Peptostreptococcus 75.09 84.78 0.85 9.94 × 10−6 1.33 1.35 × 10−6
        Species Peptostreptococcus stomatis 74.73 84.50 0.87 5.67 × 10−6 1.36 7.37 × 10−7
    Family Erysipelotrichaceae 86.74 92.34 0.76 0.03 1.31 7.50 × 10−4
    Genus Mycoplasma 32.80 51.51 0.50 0.02 0.83 1.64 × 10−4
        Species Mycoplasma faucium 32.44 50.76 0.48 0.03 0.76 5.64 × 10−4
    Species Veillonella sp. oral taxon 780 69.89 78.07 0.74 2.31 × 10−4 1.06 4.99 × 10−5
Phylum Spirochaetes
    Species Treponema denticola 46.24 64.93 0.59 1.08 × 10−3 0.82 2.26 × 10−4
    Species Treponema medium 42.47 61.91 0.61 6.32 × 10−4 0.94 2.91 × 10−5
Phylum SR1 33.33 48.20 0.48 0.02 0.92 1.86 × 10−5
a

For each taxon, individuals were categorized into carriers and noncarriers according to whether they carried the taxon or not. The associations of taxon prevalence with race/African ancestry percentage were evaluated using logistic regression analyses.

b

Bonferroni-corrected P values, adjusted for 71 independent tests.