Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov;15(11):1478–1488. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.4951

Table 2.

MR estimates of the causal effect of amyloid on t-tau and p-tau as well as the causal effect of t-tau on amyloid

Study type Methods β se 95% CI P value
Amyloid SNPs with t-tau MR Egger 0.85 0.15 0.54 to 1.15 <.001
Weighted median 0.73 0.22 0.31 to 1.16 <.001
IVW 0.86 0.11 0.65 to 1.08 <.001
Simple median 0.81 0.50 −0.17 to 1.80 .110
Amyloid SNPs with p-tau MR Egger 0.73 0.17 0.39 to 1.06 <.001
Weighted median 0.62 0.23 0.17 to 1.06 .006
IVW 0.86 0.12 0.62 to 1.10 <.001
Simple median 1.31 0.52 0.29 to 2.33 .014
t-tau SNPs with amyloid MR Egger −0.45 0.36 −1.15 to 0.26 .23
Weighted median −0.31 0.29 −0.87 to 0.25 .27
IVW −0.02 0.20 −0.42 to 0.38 .93
Simple median −0.20 2.05 −4.22 to 3.81 .92

Abbreviations: β, β coefficient; CI, confidence interval; IVW, inverse-variance weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; t-tau, total tau; p-tau, phosphorylated tau; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.