Table 3.
Effect of intervention on domain 1 score = performance indicator, feedback and training
| Intervention group | Control group | Intervention vs. control groupa,b; p value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-intervention (Mean ± SD) | Post-intervention (Mean ± SD) | Pre-intervention (Mean ± SD) | Post-intervention (Mean ± SD) | ||
| Overall | |||||
| 2.95 ± 0.48 | 3.17 ± 0.47 | 3.03 ± 0.50 | 3.02 ± 0.46 | 0.21 (0.09; 0.34)**; 0.001 | |
| Location | |||||
| Metropolitan | 3.07 ± 0.52 | 3.21 ± 0.47 | 3.04 ± 0.50 | 3.03 ± 0.49 | 0.15 (− 0.07; 0.37); 0.175 |
| Non-metropolitan | 2.83 ± 0.40 | 3.11 ± 0.47 | 2.99 ± 0.51 | 2.99 ± 0.41 | 0.26 (0.17; 0.35)***; 0.000 |
| Job role | |||||
| Physician | 2.94 ± 0.41 | 3.05 ± 0.45 | 2.99 ± 0.51 | 2.96 ± 0.41 | 0.12 (− 0.08; 0.31); 0.243 |
| Nurse | 2.95 ± 0.50 | 3.19 ± 0.47 | 3.07 ± 0.48 | 3.05 ± 0.46 | 0.25 (0.06; 0.44)*; 0.010 |
*p value < 0.05 considered as significant
**p value < 0.01 considered as significant
***p value < 0.001 considered as significant
aChange from pre-intervention to post-intervention survey
bLinear mixed model controlled for category based on baseline thrombolysis rate