Girardis 2016.
| Methods | RCT | |
| Participants |
Sample size: 480 (experimental 244, control 236) Sex (male %): experimental 57%, control 56% Age (median): experimental 65, control 63 Country: Italy Setting: multidisciplinary ICU Disease severity score: SAPS II score median 38 Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
| Interventions |
Experimental: oxygen therapy was administered according to standard ICU practice; FiO2 of at least 0.4, allowing PaO2 values up to 150 mmHg and an SpO2 between 97% and 100%. If the SpO2 decreased below 95% to 97%, the FiO2 was increased to reach the target value of SpO2. Participants received FiO2 of 1.0 during intubation, airway suction, or hospital transfer. Categorized by us as using a high target in the experimental group. Control: oxygen therapy was administered at the lowest possible FiO2 to maintain the PaO2 between 70 and 100 mmHg or SpO2 values between 94% and 98%. FiO2 was gradually reduced or oxygen supplementation discontinued whenever the PaO2 or SpO2 exceeded 100 mmHg or 98%. Supplemental oxygen was administered only if SpO2 decreased below 94%. Categorized by us as using a high target in the control group. Co‐intervention: not specified Duration: until ICU discharge |
|
| Outcomes |
Secondary outcomes not prespecified
|
|
| Notes | Email sent 6 December 2018 to Dr Girardis and reply was received. The trial was funded by public grants. |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated random numbers |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | The randomization sequence was concealed from the researchers by use of sequentially numbered, closed, opaque envelopes that were opened after patient study inclusion. |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Not described; however, blinding of outcome assessment was clarified by email |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Results from intention‐to‐treat analyses are provided in the supplementary. 2 participants withdrew consent, randomization groups for these 2 participants were not reported, thus they could not be included in the sensitivity analysis on losses to follow‐up. Outcome respiratory failure: 18 in experimental and 15 in control group were lost to follow‐up |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | The trial was registered retrospectively (NCT01319643) |
| Other bias | High risk | Early stopping bias: the trial was stopped after an interim analysis that was not pre‐planned |