Jakkula 2018.
| Methods | RCT with a 2‐by‐3 factorial design. We only extracted data from the normoxia and moderate‐hyperoxia groups. | |
| Participants |
Sample size: 123 (experimental 60, control 63) Sex (male %): experimental 48%, control 50% Age: experimental 60, control 59 Country: Finland Setting: adults admitted to the ICU after OHCA Disease severity score: APACHE II score median 28 Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
| Interventions |
Experimental: target PaO2of 20 to 25 kPa (150 to 187.5 mmHg). Categorized by us as using a high target in the experimental group Control: target PaO2 of 10 to 15 kPa (75 to 112.5 mmHg) or target SpO2 of 95% to 98%. Categorized by us as using a high target in the control group Co‐intervention: all adults received TTM at 33 °C or 36 °C and were sedated according to the treating clinicians’ instructions. All adults received standard care, monitoring and assessments based on the protocol of the ICU, including direct blood pressure monitoring via an arterial catheter. Duration: 36 hours |
|
| Outcomes |
Primary outcome
Secondary outcomes
Feasibility outcomes
|
|
| Notes | Email sent 6 December 2018 to Dr Jakkula but no reply was received. The trial was funded by public and private funds. The funding bodies had no input regarding the design, management, or reporting of the trial. |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated random numbers |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Web‐based system |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | The treating personnel were not blinded to treatment targets. |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The neurophysiologist analysing the EEG results and the neurologist evaluating the neurologic recovery of the participants were blinded to the study group allocations. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Less than 5% were lost to follow‐up. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The trial was registered prior to randomization (NCT02698917). |
| Other bias | Low risk | The trial appeared to be free of other issues that could put it at risk of bias. |