Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 27;14:385. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1363-y

Table 6.

Heterogeneity and subgroup analyses of each included study

Kanchanatawan et al. Dai et al. Xu et al. Shen et al.
PRP v HA PRP v placebo PRP v HA PRP v placebo PRP v HA PRP v placebo PRP v Control
Statistical heterogeneity analysis + + + +
Subgroup or sensitivity analysis
 Primary study quality + + + +
 Age
 Gender
 OA grade
 WOMAC total score + (≤ 1 year) + (≤ 1 year) + (6, 12 months) +(6, 12 months) + (3, 6, 12 months) +(6 months) +(3, 6, 12 months)
 WOMAC pain score + (≤ 1 year) + (≤ 1 year) + (6, 12 months) +(6, 12 months) +(3, 6, 12 months)
 WOMAC functional score + (≤ 1 year) + (≤ 1 year) + (6, 12 months) +(6, 12 months) +(3, 6, 12 months)
 Lequesne score + (≤ 1 year) + (6, 12 months) + (6 months)
 IKDC score + (≤ 1 year) + (6, 12 months) + (6 months) +(6 months)
 VAS score + (≤ 1 year) + (6 months)
 Adverse events + + + + +
 No. of PRP injection (1 or ≥ 2); PRP spinning approach (single or double); mean platelet concentration (> or < 5*baseline); LP or LR PRP; with an activator or not, risk of bias +