Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 8;1(2):133–140. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12023

Table 2.

Response according to treatment group

Total, N = 162 Single fraction, N = 65 Multiple fraction, N = 97 P‐value
Pain score response
4 wk 129/162 (79.6%) 50/65a (76.9%) 79/97 (81.4%) .394
12 wk 138/159 (86.8%) 54/63 (85.7%) 84/96 (87.5%) .938
24 wk 136/158 (86.1%) 51/62 (82.3%) 85/96 (88.5%) .228
Pain score progression
4 wk 6/162 (3.7%) 4/65 (6.2%) 2/97 (2.1%) .176
12 wk 5/159 (3.1%) 2/63 (3.2%) 3/96 (3.1%) .986
24 wk 11/158 (6.9%) 4/62 (6.5%) 7/96 (7.3%) .839
Analgesic score response
4 wk 81/162 (50%) 30/65 (46.2%) 51/97 (52.6%) .155
12 wk 92/159 (57.9%) 34/63 (54%) 58/96 (60.4%) .319
24 wk 93/158 (58.9%) 34/62 (54.8%) 59/96 (61.5%) .056
Analgesic score progression
4 wk 16/162 (9.9%) 10/65 (15.4%) 6/97 (6.2%) .054
12 wk 20/159 (12.6%) 11/63 (17.5%) 9/96 (9.4%) .133
24 wk 27/158 (17.1%) 16/62 (9.9%) 11/96 (11.5%) .019b
International consensus endpoint
4 wk
CR 52/162 (32.1%) 18/65 (27.7%) 34/97 (35.1%)
PR 39/162 (24.1%) 15/65 (23.1%) 24/97 (24.7%)
ORR 92/162 (56.2%) 33/65 (50.8%) 58/97 (59.8%) .364
Progression 54/162 (33.3%) 22/65 (33.8%) 32/97 (33.0%) .910
12 wk
CR 55/159 (34.6%) 21/63 (33.3%) 34/96 (35.4%)
PR 44/159 (27.7%) 18/63 (28.6%) 26/96 (27.1%)
ORR 99/159 (62.3%) 39/63 (61.9%) 60/96 (62.5%) .466
Progression 38/159 (23.9%) 13/63 (20.6%) 25/96 (26.0%) .384
24 wk
CR 89/158 (56.3%) 33/62 (53.2%) 56/96 (58.3%)
PR 14/158 (8.9%) 5/62 (8.1%) 9/96 (9.4%)
ORR 103/158 (65.2%) 38/62 (61.3%) 65/96 (67.7%) .259
Progression 28/158 (17.7%) 10/62 (16.1%) 18/96 (18.8%) .599

CR, complete response; PR, partial response; ORR, overall response (CR + PR).

a

Number of patients within treatment group.

b

P < .05.