Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 27.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 7;150(7):474–484. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-7-200904070-00007

Appendix Table 3.

Association Between LDL Subfraction and Incident Cardiovascular Events (Not Full Extraction)

Author, Year
(Reference)
Type of
Test
Study Design Mean
Age, y*
Persons
>65 y, %
Men, %* Diabetic
Persons, %*
Smokers, % Lipid Data
Howard et al, 2000 (36) No data Prospective longitudinal 56 ~15 Not reported 47 35 (current) LDL-c: 113 mg/dL
Arsenault et al, 2007 (23) GE Nested case–control 65 ~50   64   6 16 (current) LDL-c: 162 mg/dL
St-Pierre et al, 2005 (29) GE Prospective longitudinal 57   0 100   5 23 (current) LDL-c: 148 mg/dL
Stampfer et al, 1996 (30) GE Nested case–control 59 ~25 100   6 56 (ever smoked) TC–HDL-c ratio: 5.2
Campos et al, 2001 (25) GE Nested case–control 60 ~30   87 16 17 (current) LDL-c: 139 mg/dL
Austin et al, 2000 (24) GE Nested case–control 68 ~70 100 17 63 (ever smoked) LDL-c: 142 mg/dL
Mykkänen et al, 1999 (27) GE Nested case–control 69 100   50 33 20 (current) TC–HDL-c ratio: 6.09
Gardner et al, 1996 (26) GE Nested case–control 59   33   73 No data 42 (not defined) Non–HDL-c: 176 mg/dL
LDL Subfraction Data Sample Duration of
Follow-up, y
Outcome Predictor Results§
Unadjusted Adjusted
Mean size, 259.1 Å 3668 or 4378 American Indians Mean, 4.8 Fatal and nonfatal CVD event
 Women Size +
 Men Size 0
 Diabetic persons Size
Mean size, 260 Å; <255 Å, 29% Men: 660 with CAD event, 1209 control participants Mean, 7.7 Fatal or nonfatal CHD Men
 Men Size +
Pattern + +
Women: 375 with CAD event, 777 control participants  Women Size +
Pattern + +
Mean size, 256.9 Å; pattern B, 40% 2072 healthy persons Unadjusted, 13; adjusted, 5 Ischemic CAD event Size
Pattern
0
+
+
Mean size, 256 Å; pattern B, 47%; indeterminate pattern, 20% 266 with CAD event, 308 control participants 7 Incident MI or CAD death Size
Pattern
+
+
0
0
Mean size, 256 Å Unadjusted analysis: 416 with CAD event, 421 control participants
Adjusted analysis: 242 with CAD event, 218 control participants
Median, 5 Confirmed MI or CAD death (on placebo) Size + +
Mean size, 260.0 Å 145 with incident CHD, 296 control participants 12 Incident CAD: MI or coronary intervention Size
Pattern
+
+
0
Mean size, 268.2 Å; pattern B or indeterminate pattern, 21% 86 with CAD event, 172 control participants Mean, 3.5 Incident MI or CAD death Size
Pattern
0
0
0
Mean size, 261.7 Å; <260 Å, 40%; >274.2 Å, 10% 124 with CAD event, 124 with no event Mean, 5 to CAD event Incident MI or CAD death Size
Pattern+
+
+**
+

CAD coronary artery disease; CHD coronary heart disease; GE gel electrophoresis; HDL-c high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MI myocardial infarction; TC total cholesterol.

*

Of case patients in case–control or cross-sectional studies (when reported separately); data at baseline.

Approximate data were estimated from means (SDs) rounded to the nearest 5%; otherwise, data are the reported values.

“Size” refers to analysis based on actual particle size (regression or comparisons of mean sizes); “pattern” refers to analysis based on distribution across categories of LDL subfractions (small, medium, or large).

§

+ smaller particles were statistically significantly associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes; 0 no statistically significant association between LDL subfractions and cardiovascular outcomes.

It was unclear how many participants were analyzed.

From reference 44.

**

The authors reported an association between LDL subfraction and cardiovascular outcomes, but no statistical analysis was performed.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure