Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 27.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018 May;65(5):1151–1165. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2787025

TABLE II.

Quantitative Measurements of the Proposed Reconnection Method on Gaps From the Automatic Segmentation Results

Datasets Methods Gap sizes Iterations Sensitivity
Specificity
DC
MCC
BP AP BP AP BP AP BP AP
DRIVE Soares [23] 5 × 5 ≤ λ ≤ 13 × 13 2 0.7097 0.7311 0.9994 0.9988 0.8194 0.8273 0.8261 0.8310
Corneal Nerve Fiber LADOS [9] 4 × 4 ≤ λ ≤ 36 × 36 2 0.7261 0.7887 0.9974 0.9953 0.7486 0.7520 0.7550 0.7565
DRIVE & IOSTAR Patches BIMSO [47] 3 × 3 ≤ λ ≤ 14 × 14 2 0.8660 0.9038 0.9998 0.9990 0.9221 0.9364 0.9235 0.9357

BP: Before processing; AP: After processing; SR: Success rate; DC: Dice coefficient; MCC: Matthews correlation coefficient.