Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 26;3(22):3740–3749. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000468

Table 5.

Individual baseline characteristics and outcome of subjects with newly diagnosed AML (de novo or secondary to MDS), unfit for standard therapy

BST-236 dose, g/m2 per d No. of induction courses Age, y ECOG PS Prior MDS No. of prior HMA courses ELN cytogenetic risk score Molecular aberration Cytogenetics Baseline BM blasts, % Baseline PB blasts, % Baseline WBC, ×109/L Best response Survival, d
0.8 2 80 1 No 0 Adverse FLT3+, NPM1+ NK 80 13 7.06 CRp 308
1.5 1 76 0 Yes 0 Intermediate IDH1+, NMP1+ NK 81 24 7.26 Withdrawn* 36
1.5 1 80 0 Yes 26 Adverse None 5q− (+ complex karyotype) 36 0 0.75 Refractory 13
2.3 1 83 2 Yes 0 Intermediate None NK 90 ND 0.75 PR 79
2.3 1 73 0 Yes 5 Intermediate None NK 58 53 2.41 Refractory 18
2.3 1 78 0 No 0 Adverse FLT3+ NK 43 30 2.50 Refractory 28
2.3 1 70 1 Yes 5 Intermediate None NK 22 9 1.86 CR 623
4.5 1 72 1 Yes 0 Adverse FLT3+, NPM1+ NK 85 ND 11.00 Refractory 207
4.5 1 77 2 Yes 10 Adverse None Del 7 30 ND 4.30 CR 397
6 1 88 1 Yes 9 Favorable NPM1+ NK 100 85 61.82 Refractory 88
6 2 81 1 No 0 Adverse None Complex karyotype 100 40 24.55 CR 195

ND, not done; NK, normal karyotype; PB, peripheral blood; PR, partial response; WBC, white blood cells.

*

Withdrawn on day 2 due to pneumonia.