Table 3. Assessment of whether dynamic management tools meet the CBD criteria (13) for being OECMs.
CBD criterion |
Do dynamic management tools as envisaged meet criterion? |
|
A: Area is not currently recognized as a PA | ||
Not currently recognized as a PA | Yes | |
B: Area is governed and managed | ||
Geographically defined space | Yes in size and area described | |
No for geographically delineated boundaries | ||
Legitimate governance authorities | Yes | |
Managed | Yes | |
C: Achieves sustained and effective contribution to in situ conservation of biodiversity | ||
Effective | Yes (assuming biodiversity and conservation benefits, regardless of objectives) |
|
Sustained over the long term | Depends on definition of “long term.” Some features may shift year to year but be in place for many years. Ultimately, it may be the intent; is the proposed length of management expected to be long-term, regardless of shorter-term dynamics? |
|
In situ conservation of biological diversity | Yes | |
Information and monitoring | Yes | |
D: Associated ecosystem functions and services and cultural, spiritual, socioeconomic, and other locally relevant values | ||
Ecosystem functions and services | Yes | |
Cultural, spiritual, socioeconomic, and other locally relevant values |
Yes (assuming explicitly accounted for) |