Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 27;5(11):eaay9969. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay9969

Table 3. Assessment of whether dynamic management tools meet the CBD criteria (13) for being OECMs.

CBD criterion Do dynamic management tools as envisaged
meet criterion?
A: Area is not currently recognized as a PA
Not currently recognized as a PA Yes
B: Area is governed and managed
Geographically defined space Yes in size and area described
No for geographically delineated boundaries
Legitimate governance authorities Yes
Managed Yes
C: Achieves sustained and effective contribution to in situ conservation of biodiversity
Effective Yes (assuming biodiversity and conservation
benefits, regardless of objectives)
Sustained over the long term Depends on definition of “long term.” Some features
may shift year to year but be in place for many
years. Ultimately, it may be the intent; is the
proposed length of management expected to be
long-term, regardless of shorter-term dynamics?
In situ conservation of biological diversity Yes
Information and monitoring Yes
D: Associated ecosystem functions and services and cultural, spiritual, socioeconomic, and other locally relevant values
Ecosystem functions and services Yes
Cultural, spiritual, socioeconomic, and other
locally relevant values
Yes (assuming explicitly accounted for)