Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 21;10:2593. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02593

TABLE 4.

Fit indices for CHS invariance across SES deprived from confirmatory factor analyses.

Model SBχ2 df RMSEA SRMR CFI TLI △CFI △SBχ2 p
1. Configural invariance 60.266 18 0.067 0.036 0.963 0.938
2. Metric invariance 80.486 23 0.069 0.053 0.949 0.934 0.014 20.220(2vs.1) <0.01
3. Partial metric 66.006 22 0.062 0.040 0.961 0.947 0.002 5.740(3vs.1) 0.219
4. Scalar invariance 78.810 27 0.061 0.044 0.954 0.949 0.007 12.804(4vs.3) <0.05
5. Partial scalar 75.325 26 0.060 0.043 0.956 0.950 0.002 9.319(5vs.3) 0.097
6. Strict 85.499 32 0.057 0.048 0.953 0.956 0.003 10.174(6vs.5) 0.118
7. Latent means 79.729 27 0.062 0.051 0.951 0.947 0.002 4.404(7vs.5) <0.05

SBχ2, Satorra–Bentler robust χ2; RMSEA, robust root mean square error of approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean-squared residual; CFI, comparative fit index; TLI, Tucker–Lewis index. Model 1 refers to the configural invariant factor model; Model 2 refers to the metric invariant factor model; Model 3 refers to a partial metric invariant factor model; Model 4 refers to a scalar invariant factor model; Model 5 refers to a partial scalar invariant factor model; Model 6 refers to the strict invariant factor model; Model 7 refers to a latent means invariant test.