Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 21;25(43):6451–6464. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i43.6451

Table 3.

Comparison of the area under the curve values and Harrell’s C index between the pathological TNM stage, clinical TNM stage, and preoperative artificial neural network

Training set
Testing set
Bio-ANN Cli-ANN
Preope-ANN cTNM pTNM Preope-ANN cTNM pTNM
Harrell’s C index 0.773 (0.753-0.795) 0.663 (0.640-0.687) 0.757 (0.735-0.779) 0.752 (0.719-0.785) 0.652 (0.615-0.688) 0.740 (0.707-0.775) 0.722 (0.698-0.746) 0.760 (0.738-0.782)
P value < 0.001 0.120 < 0.001 0.539 aP < 0.001; bP = 0.000; cP = 0.018 dP < 0.001 eP < 0.000; fP = 0.827
AIC 4977.83 5176.70 4999.80 1952.94 2020.37 1951.84 5115.9 5011.9
Relative likelihood < 0.001 < 0.001 <0.001 1.733 aP < 0.001; bP > 1 cP < 0.001 dP = 0.001 E > 1 fP = 0.06
a

P, Bio-artificial neural network (ANN) vs preoperative ANN (preope-ANN);

b

P, Bio-ANN vs clinical TNM (cTNM);

c

P, Bio-ANN vs pathological TNM (pTNM).

d

P, cli-ANN vs preope-ANN;

e

P, cli-ANN vs cTNM;

f

P, cli-ANN vs pTNM. pTNM: Pathological TNM; cTNM: Clinical TNM; preope-ANN: Preoperative artificial neural network; AIC: Akaike information criterion.