Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 22;5(11):e02787. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02787

Table 2.

All Labours-CAM versus Control group.

All Labours CAM Group
Control Group
Statistical Significance
All Labours
N = 397
All Labours
N = 647
In Induction group
IOL to Onset of labour Interval (hours), mean (range; SD)
17.2 (1–109; 20) 14.6 (1–189; 18) 2.6 h more in CAM group; P = 0.009
In Induction group
IOL to Delivery Interval (hours), mean (range; SD)
23.8 (1–128; 21.5) 21.2 (1–200; 19.2) 3.2 h more in CAM group; p = 0.0001
∗∗Length of labour (hours), mean (range; SD) 6.5 (0.5–36; 4.4) 7.2 (0.5–42; 5) p = 0.75
Epidural rate: n (%) 110 (28) 213 (33) p = 0.08
Use of oxytocin for induction: n (%) 60 (41) 87 (35) p = 0.24
Use of oxytocin for labour augmentation: n (%) 56 (17) 137 (24.5) P = 0.007; RR = 0.68 (CI 0.5–0.9)
Vaginal delivery with no intervention (including vaginal breech delivery): n (%) 276 (69.5) 451 (70) p = 0.9
∗∗∗Instrumental: n (%) 63 (16) 127 (20) p = 0.1
Emergency Caesarean Section (EMCS): n (%) 58 (15) 69 (11) p = 0.1
Mean Blood loss in all deliveries ml (SD) 458 (384) 477 (451) p = 0.5
Mean Blood loss excluding caesarean sections: n (SD) 410 (340) 435 (425) p = 0.36
Major PPH(>1500ml) in vaginal deliveries: n/total vaginal deliveries (%) 10/339 (3) 24/578 (4) p = 0.47
Significant Perineal Trauma: n (%) 22/339 (6.5) 16/578 (3) p = 0.008; RR 2.3 (95% CI 1.2–4)
Shoulder dystocia: n (%) 6/339 (2) 9/578 (1.6) p = 0.79
Neonatal Admission: n (%) 6 (1.5) 15 (2.3) p = 0.40

Epidural for labour analgesic.

∗∗

Length of labour-from onset of labour to delivery.

∗∗∗

includes both ventouse and forceps delivery.