Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 15;2019:3295781. doi: 10.1155/2019/3295781

Table 4.

Interaction analysis between three SNPs genotypes and waist circumference on breast cancer risk.

Genotypes Waist circumference (cm) Cases Controls Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)a P a
rs17467825
 AA ≥80 283 (35.8%) 255 (28.1%) 1.00 1.00
 AA <80 94 (11.9%) 147 (16.2%) 0.58 (0.43–0.79) 0.69 (0.49–0.98) 0.037
 AG ≥80 249 (31.5%) 259 (28.5%) 0.86 (0.68–1.10) 0.85 (0.66–1.09) 0.203
 AG <80 76 (9.6%) 155 (17.1%) 0.44 (0.32–0.61) 0.46 (0.31–0.66) <0.001
 GG ≥80 71 (9.0%) 49 (5.4%) 1.31 (0.87–1.95) 1.22 (0.80–1.87) 0.342
 GG <80 18 (2.3%) 44 (4.8%) 0.37 (0.21–0.65) 0.40 (0.21–0.75) 0.004
P for multiplicative interaction 0.057

rs2298850
 GG ≥80 272 (34.1%) 251 (27.3%) 1.00 1.00
 GG <80 95 (11.9%) 142 (15.4%) 0.62 (0.46–0.85) 0.72 (0.51–1.03) 0.069
 GC ≥80 264 (33.1%) 270 (29.3%) 0.90 (0.71–1.14) 0.87 (0.67–1.12) 0.280
 GC <80 77 (9.7%) 158 (17.2%) 0.45 (0.32–0.62) 0.46 (0.32–0.67) <0.001
 CC ≥80 71 (8.9%) 51 (5.5%) 1.29 (0.87–1.92) 1.18 (0.77–1.79) 0.443
 CC <80 18 (2.3%) 48 (5.2%) 0.35 (0.20–0.61) 0.37 (0.20–0.70) 0.002
P for multiplicative interaction 0.031

rs3755967
 CC ≥80 277 (34.9%) 252 (27.6%) 1.00 1.00
 CC <80 95 (12.0%) 144 (15.8%) 0.61 (0.44–0.83) 0.7 (0.49–0.99) 0.045
 CT ≥80 257 (32.4%) 267 (29.2%) 0.87 (0.68–1.11) 0.85 (0.66–1.10) 0.222
 CT <80 75 (9.4%) 153 (16.8%) 0.44 (0.32–0.62) 0.46 (0.32–0.67) <0.001
 TT ≥80 72 (9.1%) 50 (5.5%) 1.31 (0.88–1.95) 1.21 (0.79–1.84) 0.379
 TT <80 18 (2.2%) 47 (5.1%) 0.35 (0.20–0.62) 0.37 (0.20–0.70) 0.002
P for multiplicative interaction 0.039

aAdjusted by age, menopausal status, BMI, family history, income, and education.