Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 27;19:1575. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7948-x

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics across categories of a lifestyle score in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study (1991–1996)

Unfavorable Lifestyle
N = 5730
Intermediate Lifestyle
N = 11,757
Favorable
Lifestyle
N = 8846
P-value**
Age, years^ 57.3 (7.4) 58.0 (7.7) 58.1 (7.6) < 0.0001
Gender ¤ < 0.0001
Male, % 34.6 36.6 42.4
Female, % 65.4 63.4 57.6
Education ¤ < 0.0001
Elementary % 48.2 41.2 35.9
Secondary % 33.8 36.1 35.8
University/college degree, % 17.9 22.6 28.3
Parental history of MI, % ¤ 31.2 32.6 31.7 0.12
History of Hypertension ¤ 64.2 60.0 58.3 < 0.0001
History of Diabetes Mellitus ¤ 5.2 3.5 3.8 < 0.0001
Body-mass Index, kg/m2 ^ 27.3 (5.2) 25.4 (3.6) 25.0 (2.9) < 0.0001
Lipid Levels*
LDL Cholesterol, mg/dl^ 4.24 (1.03) 4.16 (0.99) 4.14 (0.97) 0.034
HDL Cholesterol, mg/dl^ 1.30 (0.34) 1.40 0.38) 1.42 0.37) < 0.0001
Triglycerides, mg/dl # 1.31 (0.97–1.82) 1.15 (0.87–1.59) 1.09 (0.82–1.51) 0.0001
Lipid-lowering Medication, % ¤ 2.3 2.2 2.1 0.67
C-Reactive Protein* # 1.9 (0.9–4.2) 1.3 (0.7–2.7) 1.1 (0.6–2.2) 0.0001
HbA1C* # 4.9 (4.6–5.3) 4.8 (4.5–5.1) 4.7 (4.4–5.0) 0.23

* Only subjects from the MDC cardiovascular cohort (N = 4995)

^Continuous variables are expressed as mean values with standard deviation in parenthesis. Differences in mean values were tested using one-way ANOVA

#Skewed continuous values are expressed as median with interquartile range in parenthesis. Differences in median were tested using Kruskal-Wallis ranksum test

¤ The distribution of subjects across the categorical variables are expressed as frequency (%). The difference in distribution was tested using the chi-square test

** P-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant