Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 18;26(1):1178–1190. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2019.1682719

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone formation (A) The titanium implant (black staining), bone (red staining) and osteoid (blue staining) were effectively distinguished using methylene blue/acid fuchsin. (B) The ratio of bone-to-implant contact (BIC) at Week 4 (n = 8, mean ± SD). (C) Quantification data for RTQ (n = 4, mean ± SD). *Compared to the Blank group. #Compared to the EMS and SMS groups. Differences are significant at p < .05.