Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 8;10:2528. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02528

TABLE 3.

Frequencies of Aspergillus section Flavi fungi in soil before biocontrol application, and in maize and groundnut grains from biocontrol -treated and control fields during 2009 and 2010.

Year Crop n Treatment Aspergillus fungi distribution (%)y

Soil before inoculationz Grain at harvest


L SBG P T L SBG P T
2009 Maize 51 Biocontrol 85.9aA 3.5aB 1.0aB 9.6aB 99.7aA 0.3aB 0.0aB 0.0aB
51 Control 87.4aA 2.7aB 1.7aB 8.2aB 93.3aA 5.9aB 0.5aB 0.3aB
Groundnut 8 Biocontrol 99.2aA 0.5bB 0.3aB 0.0aB 100.0aA 0.0aB 0.0aB 0.0aB
8 Control 82.4bA 11.5aB 0.3aB 5.8aB 95.6aA 1.6aB 2.8aB 0.0aB
2010 Maize 14 Biocontrol 89.9aA 7.1aB 3.0aB 100.0aA 0.0bB 0.0aB
14 Control 77.9aA 14.8aB 7.3aB 83.4bA 16.3aB 0.3aC
Groundnut 16 Biocontrol 97.8aA 2.2aB 0.0aB 100.0aA 0.0aB 0.0aB
16 Control 96.3aA 2.8aB 0.9aB 95.7aA 3.5aB 0.8aB

yThe frequency (%) of fungi (x) were log transformed (log10[x + 1]) prior to analysis to stabilize the variance. L, A. flavus L morphotype; SBG, SBG strains; P, A. parasiticus; T = A. tamarii (not found in 2010). zThe means of paired treated and control fields for a crop within each column with different lowercase letters are significantly different (Student’s t-test, α = 0.05). Means of fungi within a row with different uppercase letters are significantly different (Fisher’s LSD test, α = 0.05).