Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 28;9:17843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54434-1

Table 2.

Overall diagnostic performance of CAD systems and radiologists for diagnosing thyroid malignancy in the validation data set (n = 286).

Performance measures Radiologists dCAD sCAD p-Value p-Value
Radiologists vs. dCAD Radiologists vs. sCAD dCAD vs. sCAD
Sensitivity

94.2%

(89.3, 97.0)

91.0%

(85.5, 94.6)

90.4%

(84.7, 94.1)

0.137
Specificity

76.9%

(68.6, 83.6)

80.0%

(72.4, 85.9)

58.5%

(49.9, 66.6)

<0.001 0.431 0.001 <0.001
PPV

83.1%

(76.5, 88.0)

84.5%

(78.3, 89.2)

72.3%

(65.6, 78.2)

<0.001 0.552 0.001 <0.001
NPV

91.7%

(84.9, 95.7)

88.1%

(81.0, 92.9)

83.5%

(74.4, 89.8)

0.084
Accuracy

86.4%

(81.7, 90.0)

86.0%

(81.6, 89.5)

75.9

(70.6, 80.5)

<0.001 0.862 <0.001 <0.001

Note – 95% confidence intervals are shown in parentheses.