Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 28;9:17843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54434-1

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance according to the experience level of the radiologists.

Performance measures Radiologists dCAD sCAD p-Value p-Value
Radiologists vs. dCAD Radiologists vs. sCAD dCAD vs.
sCAD
Nodules Assessed by Experienced Radiologists (n = 184)
Sensitivity

92.9%

(85.8, 96.6)

90.8%

(83.3, 95.2)

90.8%

(83.3, 95.2)

0.599
Specificity

87.2%

(78.3, 92.8)

84.9%

(75.9, 90.9)

58.1%

(47.7, 67.9)

<0.001 0.527 <0.001 <0.001
PPV

89.2%

(81.5, 93.9)

87.3%

(79.4, 92.4)

71.2%

(62.7, 78.4)

<0.001 0.476 <0.001 <0.001
NPV

91.5%

(83.1, 95.9)

89.0%

(80.2, 94.2)

84.8%

(73.2, 91.9)

0.318
Accuracy

90.8%

(83.3, 95.2)

88.0%

(82.6, 92.0)

75.5%

(68.8, 81.2)

<0.001 0.284 <0.001 <0.001
Nodules Assessed by Inexperienced Radiologists (n = 102)
Sensitivity

96.6%

(87.5, 99.1)

91.4%

(81.3, 96.3)

89.7%

(78.9, 95.3)

0.145
Specificity

56.8%

(41.6, 70.9)

70.5%

(55.9, 81.8)

59.1%

(44.0, 72.7)

0.221
PPV

74.7%

(62.9, 83.7)

80.3%

(68.8, 88.3)

74.3%

(62.5, 83.3)

0.270
NPV

92.6%

(74.8, 98.1)

86.1%

(70.7, 94.1)

81.3%

(63.9, 91.4)

0.241
Accuracy

79.4%

(70.1, 86.4)

82.4%

(73.9, 88.5)

76.5%

(67.2, 83.8)

0.409

Note – 95% confidence intervals are shown in parentheses.