Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 4;65(12):1508–1521. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2019.306902

Table 2.

Biomarkers of systemic inflammation at baseline and 1 year, by vitamin D randomization.

Active vitamin D, n = 784 Placebo vitamin D, n = 777 Overall percent change active/placebo vitamin D (95% CI) P unadjusted modela P adjusted modelb
Baseline ln (IL-6) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI) 1.71 (1.65–1.78) 1.68 (1.61–1.74)
Year 1 ln (IL-6) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI) 1.80 (1.73–1.87) 1.63 (1.57–1.69)
Percent change from baseline (95% CI) 5.08% (0.46–9.91) −2.88% (−7.16 to 1.60) 8.19% (1.52–15.31) 0.02 c 0.02
Baseline ln (TNFR2) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI) 2546.5 (2508.6–2584.9) 2525.4 (2482.7–2568.9)
Year 1 ln (TNFR2) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI) 2604.7 (2565.2–2644.7) 2567.9 (2523.9–2612.7)
Percent change from baseline (95% CI) 2.32% (1.13–3.53) 1.68% (0.49–2.89) 0.63% (−1.03 to 2.31) 0.46 0.57
Baseline ln (hsCRP) mg/L, geometric mean (95% CI) 1.48 (1.40–1.57) 1.51 (1.43–1.60)
Year 1 ln (hsCRP) mg/L, geometric mean (95% CI) 1.62 (1.53–1.71) 1.54 (1.46–1.63)
Percent change from baseline (95% CI) 9.46% (2.93–16.39) 2.18% (−3.94 to 8.68) 7.12% (−1.81 to 16.87) 0.12 0.16
a

Linear models comparing natural logarithm of biomarker concentration in active vs placebo vitamin D groups.

b

Linear models comparing natural logarithm of biomarker concentration in active vs placebo vitamin D groups, adjusted for age, sex, race, and n-3 FA randomized treatment group.

c

Values in bold indicate statistical significance, P < 0.05.