Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 4;65(12):1508–1521. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2019.306902

Table 3.

Biomarkers of systemic inflammation at baseline and 1 year, by n-3 FA randomization.

Active n-3 FA, n = 784 Placebo n-3 FA, n = 777 Overall percent change active/placebo n-3 FA (95% CI) P unadjusted modela P adjusted modelb
Baseline ln (IL-6) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI) 1.69 (1.63–1.75) 1.70 (1.63–1.77)
Year 1 ln (IL-6) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI) 1.70 (1.64–1.77) 1.72 (1.66–1.79)
Percent change from baseline (95% CI) 0.67% (−3.76 to 5.31) 1.41% (−3.07 to 6.10) −0.73% (−6.87 to 5.81) 0.82 0.97
Baseline ln (TNFR2) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI) 2571.3 (2528.1–2615.2) 2500.9 (2463.6–2538.8)
Year 1 ln (TNFR2) pg/mL, geometric mean (95% CI) 2605.3 (2561.4–2649.9) 2567.3 (2527.7–2607.6)
Percent change from baseline (95% CI) 1.35% (0.17–2.55) 2.66% (1.46–3.87) −1.27% (−2.89 to 0.39) 0.13 0.13
Baseline ln (hsCRP) mg/L, geometric mean (95% CI) 1.57 (1.49–1.66) 1.43 (1.35–1.51)
Year 1 ln (hsCRP) mg/L, geometric mean (95% CI) 1.63 (1.54–1.72) 1.53 (1.45–1.62)
Percent change from baseline (95% CI) 3.70% (−2.49 to 10.27) 7.90% (1.44–14.77) −3.89% (−11.92 to 4.86) 0.37 0.44
a

Linear models comparing natural logarithm of biomarker concentration in active vs placebo n-3 FA groups.

b

Linear models comparing natural logarithm of biomarker concentration in active n-3 FA vs placebo n-3 FA groups, adjusted for age, sex, race, and vitamin D randomized treatment group.